is the issue that the wishes of the Lummi Nation are not going to be honored? Does this sacred site fall under their ownership? Not that ownership is everything, mind you. I'm just trying to get clarity on the issue.
Good questions, Tara. Thanks for watching the video.
My understanding is that the issue is treaty rights in regard to salmon fishing as well as negative environmental impact to the people of the Lummi Nation and their 13,000-acre reservation lands.
SSA Marine, an international shipping giant, wishes to ship coal via trains from Montana and Wyoming to a major deep-water port that is proposed to be built on land adjacent to the Lummi Nation and in the midst of its treaty-guaranteed traditional fishing waters.
Here is the Lummi Nation's position statement, written by Lummi Indian Business Council Chairman, Tim Ballew:
"The Lummi Nation has a commitment to protect the treaty fishing right provided by the Point Elliot Treaty of 1855. With that commitment comes the need to protect both our habitat and our usual and accustomed territory. The proposed development at Cherry Point would clearly create unavoidable adverse impacts. These proposed impacts would be permanent and the Lummi Nation does not foresee any way to mitigate the damage. The project would have a direct impact on the Nation's fishing right and our way of life. We hold the Army Corps of Engineers accountable to uphold the Federal Government's trust responsibility to protect the treaty fishing right."
There is concern that the wishes of the Lummi Nation will not be honored, despite treaty rights.
How can I be useful, of what service can I be? There is something inside me, what can it be? -- Vincent van Gogh (1853-1890)
Welcome to "37TH DREAM (RUMORS OF PEACE)".
The photograph currently at the top of my blog was taken from my porch before sunrise on October 29, 2023.
"OLD GIRL OF THE NORTH COUNTRY" (the earliest name for my blog -- http://oldgirlfromthenorthcountry.blogspot.com
) came to life in early December of 2006 so that I could post a 42-year retrospective of my paintings and drawings and through that action, create a new relationship with the day the man I loved returned from Vietnam in December 1970. For a while (sometime after spring of 2008, which is when he died) my blog was "TALKING 37TH DREAM WITH RAINBOW (RUMORS OF PEACE)". For a number of years, it's been "TALKING 37TH DREAM (RUMORS OF PEACE)." As of April 12, 2017 my blog was titled "37TH DREAM / TALKING 37TH DREAM (RUMORS OF PEACE/LOOKING UP)". Somewhere along the way it became 37TH DREAM (RUMORS OF PEACE).
To begin viewing the retrospective with narrative, scroll down to December 8, 2006, on this page:
I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word in reality. This is why right temporarily defeated is stronger than evil triumphant. -- Martin Luther King, Jr. (1929-1968)
All journeys have secret destinations of which the traveler is unaware. -- Martin Buber (1878-1965)
It is only a little planet, but how beautiful it is.
-- Robinson Jeffers
The true end of a war is the rebirth of life; the right to die peacefully in your own bed. The true end of war is the end of fear; the true end of war is the return of laughter.
-- Alfred Molano
Enjoy every sandwich -- Warren Zevon (1947-2003)
Not in God's wilds will you ever hear the sad moan, "All is vanity." No, we are paid a thousand times for all our toil, and after a single day spent outdoors in their atmosphere of strength and beauty, one could still say, should death come — even without any hope of another life — "Thank you for this most glorious gift!" and pass on.
-- John Muir (1838-1914)
Philip Henslowe: Mr. Fennyman, allow me to explain about the theatre business. The natural condition is one of insurmountable obstacles on the road to imminent disaster. Hugh Fennyman: So what do we do? Philip Henslowe: Nothing. Strangely enough, it all turns out well. Hugh Fennyman: How? Philip Henslowe: I don't know. It's a mystery.
2 comments:
is the issue that the wishes of the Lummi Nation are not going to be honored? Does this sacred site fall under their ownership? Not that ownership is everything, mind you. I'm just trying to get clarity on the issue.
Good questions, Tara. Thanks for watching the video.
My understanding is that the issue is treaty rights in regard to salmon fishing as well as negative environmental impact to the people of the Lummi Nation and their 13,000-acre reservation lands.
SSA Marine, an international shipping giant, wishes to ship coal via trains from Montana and Wyoming to a major deep-water port that is proposed to be built on land adjacent to the Lummi Nation and in the midst of its treaty-guaranteed traditional fishing waters.
Here is the Lummi Nation's position statement, written by Lummi Indian Business Council Chairman, Tim Ballew:
"The Lummi Nation has a commitment to protect the treaty fishing right provided by the Point Elliot Treaty of 1855. With that commitment comes the need to protect both our habitat and our usual and accustomed territory. The proposed development at Cherry Point would clearly create unavoidable adverse impacts. These proposed impacts would be permanent and the Lummi Nation does not foresee any way to mitigate the damage. The project would have a direct impact on the Nation's fishing right and our way of life. We hold the Army Corps of Engineers accountable to uphold the Federal Government's trust responsibility to protect the treaty fishing right."
There is concern that the wishes of the Lummi Nation will not be honored, despite treaty rights.
This gives the historical context:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zA54BPsSgi0
Post a Comment